home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1552>
- <title>
- Apr. 26, 1993: Who's Afraid of The Big Bad Bang?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Apr. 26, 1993 The Truth about Dinosaurs
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 74
- Who's Afraid of The Big Bad Bang?
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Dennis Overbye
- </p>
- <p> Scientists, it seems, are becoming the new villains of
- Western society. Once portrayed as heroes, they now appear in
- movies betraying Sigourney Weaver to bring home an alien for
- "the company" or being oblivious to Susan Sarandon's desperate
- search for a cure for her son. We read about them in the
- newspapers faking and stealing data, and we see them in front
- of congressional committees defending billion-dollar research
- budgets. We hear them in sound bites trampling our sensibilities
- by comparing the Big Bang or some subatomic particle to God.
- </p>
- <p> Last summer a journalist named Bryan Appleyard rode this
- discontent to the top of England's best-seller lists with a
- neoconservative polemic called Understanding the Present,
- subtitled Science and the Soul of Modern Man. In Britain, the
- book inspired headlines such as FOR GOD'S SAKE FIRE THE BIG BANG
- BRIGADE. Its publication in the U.S. has begun to strike sparks.
- Science, maintains Appleyard, devalues questions it can't
- answer, such as the meaning of life or the existence of God. Its
- relentless advance has driven the magic out of the world,
- leaving us with nothing to believe in. With no standards,
- liberal democracies descend into moral anarchy and cultural
- relativism. Once Galileo looked through that telescope, it
- seems, the Los Angeles riots were only a matter of time.
- Science, he concludes ominously, must be "humbled."
- </p>
- <p> Appleyard would lay the woes of the 20th century at
- Stephen Hawking's wheelchair. Commenting on Hawking's
- oft-expressed hope that physicists may soon construct a theory
- that would unite all the forces of nature into one mathematical
- equation suitable for a T shirt, a so-called theory of
- everything, he declaims alarmingly that it could be used to
- predict that "a particular snowflake would fall on a particular
- blade of grass or that you would be reading this now." Never
- mind that such deterministic ambitions died long ago with the
- discovery of quantum uncertainty. Faced with that prospect, who
- would not reach for the candles and tarot cards?
- </p>
- <p> Scientists are partly to blame for this mess. They have
- silently acquiesced in the proposition that if we just keep
- writing checks and leaving them alone, science could solve the
- problems of the world. They have promoted the presentation of
- themselves as antiseptic drones, whose work is uncorrupted by
- influences like sex, greed or ambition, which muddy life for the
- rest of us. But science is done by real people who do not check
- their humanity at the lab door. Lamentably but humanly, they do
- shoot their mouths off too much about God and the egregiously
- misnamed theory of everything. The Young Turks of every
- generation for the past hundred years have proclaimed the
- imminent end of physics, but every advance has only opened new
- vistas of mysteries. There is no reason to think we even know
- the right questions yet, let alone ultimate answers. The
- currency of science is not truth, but doubt.
- </p>
- <p> And, paradoxically, faith. Science is nothing if not a
- spiritual undertaking. The idea that nature forms some sort of
- coherent whole, a universe, ruled by laws accessible to us, is
- a faith. The creation and end of the universe are theological
- notions, not astronomical ones.
- </p>
- <p> We can only wonder whether some law of laws will stand
- revealed some day at the end of the grudging trial-and-error
- process of science. The theory of everything, even if it
- existed, however, could not pretend to tell us what we most want
- to know. It could not tell us why the universe exists--why
- there is something rather than nothing at all. And it could not
- tell us if our lives have meaning, if God loves us.
- </p>
- <p> Written on a piece of paper or on a T shirt, the theory of
- everything would just lie there waiting for something else to
- breathe fire into it. The question of whether the universe is
- steady state or Big Bang, or whether it has 10 dimensions or
- four, is just decorative trim around the grand mystery of why
- anything or any law exists. But by reminding us of our deep
- cosmic ignorance, science, far from dulling the mystery of
- existence, sharpens it the way garlic wafting on the evening
- breeze whets your appetite. It reminds us that we dwell in a
- mystery that is ultimately more to be savored than solved.
- </p>
- <p> On God's love science is also silent, and that silence is
- the wind of liberation. Physicists can neither prove nor
- disprove that Jesus turned water into wine, only that such a
- transformation is improbable under the present admittedly
- provisional physical laws. Quantum theory and tensor equations
- are part of nature as much as trees and rains and sex. We are,
- all of us, including Appleyard, free to make what we want of it.
- We are free to wake up every morning grateful for the feeling
- of sunshine on our face or grumpy for the prospect of tomorrow's
- rain. The fact that science cannot find any purpose to the
- universe does not mean there is not one. We are free to
- construct parables for our moral edification out of the law of
- the jungle, or out of the evolution and interdependence of
- species. But the parables we choose will only reflect the values
- we have already decided to enshrine.
- </p>
- <p> If this be alienation, make the most of it. We could have
- used a little more in, say, Nazi Germany. If history teaches us
- anything, it is to beware people who know the truth. Appleyard
- and his neoconservative friends moan about the demise of moral
- and cultural authority and bash liberal democracy because it
- fails to choose. But the failure to choose is itself a choice.
- What it chooses is that people are, or can be, grown ups. That
- too is a value, the notion that we all individually or
- collectively may be the salvation of one another. Cosmic
- ignorance does not diminish us, it ennobles us.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-